A verb in the aorist past, that is, in the past tense and the aorist aspect (the event described by the verb viewed as a completed whole). Also called the perfective past. The nearest equivalent in English is the simple past. The term aorist is used particularly often for verbs in Ancient and Modern Greek. (noun) एओरिस्ट अतीत में एक क्रिया, जो कि भूतकाल में है और एओरिस्ट पहलू (क्रिया द्वारा वर्णित घटना को पूर्ण रूप से देखा जाता है)। इसे संपूर्ण अतीत भी कहा जाता है। अंग्रेजी में निकटतम समकक्ष साधारण अतीत है। एओरिस्ट शब्द का प्रयोग विशेष रूप से प्राचीन और आधुनिक ग्रीक में क्रियाओं के लिए किया जाता है।
Of or pertaining to a verb in the aorist aspect. (adjective) या aorist पहलू में एक क्रिया से संबंधित।
Examples of word aorist
It's in what's called the aorist tense, which is a technical way of saying that Jesus 'anger is a temporary feeling.
While the 3sg hi-ending appears to come from the 'aorist', I am puzzled why you say this form has a *ē in the root.
IEists for example volley terms about like "aorist" (aspectual or tensal?) and "markedness" (phonetic or inflectional?) within a variety of sometimes contradictory contexts and it's important to recognize the shades of subtlety.
In aspect, verbs can be simple ( "aorist") ( "Brutus stabbed Caesar"), progressive ( "Brutus was stabbing Caesar"), or perfect ( "Brutus has stabbed Caesar").
" I should more aptly compare the non-continuous form *bʰḗr-m̥ 'I carry/carried' to the sigmatic "aorist" since they both end up being employed for past tense in later PIE dialects unlike the continuous presentive.
It suggests a world in which my being able to rattle off the aorist participles of λυω entitles me to a seat next to Brad DeLong.
Two: The traditional "present-aorist-perfect" verb model which is notorious for being an inadequate model representative only of a post-IE stage can be reworked into an earlier two-dimensional system of subjective/objective versus progressive/non-progressive to now explain why Anatolian & Tocharian verbs behave so differently.
All this being said, we then understand why the perfective action could not possibly have been originally marked by *-i as proven by non-Anatolian dialects if its function were originally to express this aspect, due to the obvious semantic contradictions that would ensue, and we also see why the sigmatic aorist couldn't have ever applied to all verbs, such as punctives, likewise to avoid simple contradiction.